Talk:Margaret Laurence

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Untitled

I tried to add form and function to the srticle as it was pretty sparse for such a valuable Canadian writer. I was having 'technical difficulties' saving some edits, so I may have just duplicated some edits. Anyway, more definitrely could be added but I don't have time now. --Mikerussell 04:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banned books

I edited out this line which was written at the bottom of the Bibliography section:

Some of her works, in particular, A Jest of God, The Stone Angel, and The Diviners, have been banned by some school boards and high schools based on religious objections.

This is too vague and thus misleading. In fact, her works are so widely used in schools that the few attempts to ban their use is thus so noteworthy. I know some boards had debates, one near Peterborough, but forget the specifics now. I think someone should look up where the banning controverseies took place and re-add it in the body of the article and not as a postscript to a List of Works section.--Mikerussell 04:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in full agreement with Mikerussell and will question the use of the word "banned". I have a vague memory that there was some call to remove this title as course material, but very much doubt that any school or schoolboard removed the novel from libraries and prohibited copies from being brought into their respective buildings. Only that would be a true ban.--Victoriagirl 02:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

McClelland and Stewart- the Canadian publisher

I readded the reference to M&S being 'famous' and 'the' Canadian publisher. Is there any other fiction publisher with their own Canada Post commerative stamp? Thus 'famous' is apt. Before M&S, it is not an exagerration to say, there was no such thing as a Canadian fiction publisher, nor a Canadian Literature, or even Canadian novelist. M&S was the first to survive as an economic viable publisher publishing Canadian writers, not British or American books plus a few Canadian titles. It predates CanCon legislation too, and thus deserves to be accurately recognized as a special publisher, historically significant, compared to the others that followed and still struggle on today.--Mikerussell 04:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find that my edit had nothing to do with whether or not M&S is famous - in fact, no such claim was made - rather the description that it was "the Canadian publisher". In fact, I am a great fan of the company, and have contributed to its entry. Just to clear things up. Victoriagirl 05:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Massey College at U of T

Is it worth mentioning that back in, I think (as I recall from my days at U of T) the 1970s Margaret Laurence was attached to Massey and spent a great deal of time with students consulting her there? Alas I cannot precisely recall precisely when that was but somewhere there must be documentation Masalai (talk) 00:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Her time in her cabin on the Otonabee River near Peterborough and her house in town

Is it not appropriate to mention the severe trauma the campaign against her book The Diviners and on her personally had on Margaret Laurence? Margaret Atwood has described both herself and Alice Munro visiting Laurence and finding her having succumbed to a severe episode of alcohol abuse. Masalai (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Margaret Laurence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Laurence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100806150641/http://www.mts.net/~mlhome/ to http://www.mts.net/~mlhome/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]