Talk:Mangelwurzel

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture Mid‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I merged information from Mangold wurzel, choosing this name as the primary because of a small preponderance of usage on the web. In any case there should only be one article, not two. -- WormRunner | Talk 02:58, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Abbé de Commerell

Some of this French text from the French WP might be worth translating for this article.

Vers 1784, il devient célèbre en publiant une brochure dans laquelle il préconise les avantages prodigieux d’une plante alors peu connue, qui est une variété de la betterave, à laquelle il donne les noms contradictoires de racine d’abondance et de racine de disette, et qu’on désigne par celui de betterave champêtre. Il a sans doute raison de recommander cette plante très productive, mais il y a beaucoup à rabattre dans les éloges qu’il en fait. Il cultive lui-même cette plante et l’a propagé dans sa région. Il distribue au loin les graines qu’il a recueillies. Une grêle effroyable ayant ravagé en 1788 les campagnes d’une partie de la France, le gouvernement fait répandre une instruction sur les moyens de réparer ses effets désastreux. Dans ce sens, il écrit un Supplément à l’Avis aux cultivateurs dont les récoltes ont été ravagées par la grêle (1788, in-8°), puis un Mémoire sur la culture, l’usage et l’avantage du chou à faucher (in-8°), un Mémoire sur l’amélioration de l’agriculture par la suppression des jachères (1788, in-8°). La même année, il propose une nouvelle édition des Mémoire et instruction sur la culture, l’usage et les avantages de la racine de disette ou betterave champêtre (Paris, in-8°)

--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 08:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 22:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with beetroot?

Beetroot and mangelwurzel are one and the same thing (Beta vulgaris). So why do we need two separate articles?? -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 16:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You sure about that, I was under the impression they were quite distinct 161.73.37.81 21:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The taxobox is very confusing - it shows them both as being a species, not a genus or anything. And they are the same species. So they should either be merged or the infobox fixed. Richard001 01:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We don't. I think that this article, which is substantially less developed that the Beet article be merged into Beet. I don't really feel like doing this, though. Wormcast (talk)

They aren't the same, that's like saying we should merge German Shepherd Dog with Gray wolf (they're both Canis lupus right?) --Pontificalibus (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marynz (talk) 07:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC) I am not sure about merging with beetroot as each has a distinct commercial use. However, merging with http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Sugar_beet would seem useful as the terms sugar beet and mangelwurzel are interchangeable.[reply]

No, neither Sugar beet, Mangelwurzel or (red) beetroot are interchangable: they are distinct varieties of Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris, with different characteristics and usages. See e.g. here. Dahauns (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Mangel beets

I find no distinction between Mangelwurzel and Mangel beets. Wright indicates that both mangels and mangel wurzels are the same as mangolds. Wright, Clifford A. (2001) Mediterranean vegetables: a cook's ABC of vegetables and their preparation page 52. It appears that while Mangelwurzel are usually grown for fodder, they can be pleasant when eaten immature. Before sugar was extracted from beets, most beet roots were grown for winter fodder, and only eaten in extremus. The tops, according to Wright were used since prehistoric times as potherbs. --Bejnar (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will redirect Mangel beets here per this, the sources given on Beet and the fact there's no significant content referenced in reliable sources to merge. --Pontificalibus (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South Somerset, Punkie and Halloween

I grew up in East Coker in South Somerset in the 1970s. I've never heard of Punkie Night (I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm wondering how common it was across South Somerset) and we carved out manglewurzels for halloween. (A local farmer let us get them from his store). It should be noted that my family weren't locals, so my knowledge of historic local lore is obviously not as good as others.

Nic Doye (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

This is one word that should have an acoustic pronunciation feature, and a phonetic version of the name. A lot of much more common words in WP have this feature. Nice word though, and I compare it to rutabaga. Myles325a (talk) 09:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mangelwurzel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Fu9TOBWl?url=http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Beta.html to http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Beta.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mangelwurzel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225214359/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Mangel-Wurzel to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Mangel-Wurzel

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Vulgaris v vulgaris?

Both the Manglewurzel and Sugar Beet claim this as their full name, but the intro to manglewurzel indicates they are distinct. Can someone please clarify this?

The full name of Sugar beet is "Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris Altissima Group". The full name of Mangelwurzel is "Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris Crassa Group". Both are different cultivars of the subsp. vulgaris.[1]. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confounds Chard and Rutabaga

The article confounds chard and rutabaga.

Both plants seem closely related in terms of botanics, but they are very different in use, typical consumption, and taste.

Chard (German de:Mangold) is grown for human consumption, tastes similar to spinach, and is quite popular as vegetable, if not as common as spinach.

Rutabaga (German de:Futterrübe) is mostly grown to feed animals. During times of scarceness and famine, it was often used as a last resort and as food for humans, but most of it preparations are not popular for their taste.62.216.207.191 (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How large do Mangelwurzels get? Could we get a better photo of a root?

Drsruli (talk) 03:21, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]