Talk:Major League Baseball/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   An engaging read; the only exception is the steroids section, but I'll address that in 3b.

   B. MoS compliance:

   The See also section is excessive. According to WP:LAYOUT, it is supposed to be a short list of related articles. As well, you should not repeat the name of the article in section headings.

   Headings are OK; the list is still excessive. Can you incorporate those vital links in the article itself? 12:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

   Good. 17:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   The steroids section is too big compared to the other section. While steroids are a very important issue in baseball right now, it does not merit 15 paragraphs, of which some are pretty choppy. I suggest halving the section at the very minimum.

   Much better now. 12:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Maxim_(talk) 17:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)