Talk:Maidstone Grammar School

Schools High‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Advertising

This appears more as an advertisement of the school than an accurate source of information about it. This is an encyclopaedia at the end of the day and most of the points made here are a matter of opinion and lack any points regarding the negative side of the school, which makes a very unbalanced article which interferes with the factual content of this article. I would suggest that all comments based on opinion such as 'impressive editing suites' be amended and other points on both sides be added. Adding 'impressive' in front of editing suites does nothing for the factual content but simply makes the school sound better. They mention how impressive parts of the school are but fail to regard the disrepair other parts are in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.108.150 (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I much agree, the article had been thusly trimmed and I post a reminder here to all, please reference anything you write. I do think someone should comb over the list of notable pupils though, just to make sure. 90.207.203.172 (talk) 20:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Recruits Camp

why does every time i add informtion about this is it deleted as vandalism, and how to i quote sources? these are newspaprre articles retrieved using lexisnexis? — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:82.34.171.9 (talk)

If you have newspaper articles, please list them, with online references if possible. See WP:CITE for inofrmation on the usual way of presenting the references, and why they are important. Also read Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thankyou for your contribution. It will not be removed if it has proper references, but you will understand that the text looks like it could be childish vandalism if it is not cited and verifiable. --Scott Davis ^Talk 05:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This did indeed happen, I was there at the time. I have included one reference, but there are definitely more from the Kent Messenger which I will try to find later.

Why do these revisions continue to be removed even with media references? This DID happen and HAS been referenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.85.246 (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

shutup you munter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmonkey2 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

anyone know how to link to associated press articles?

Added back in previous edit about the camp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.240.38 (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music

Following comment removed from artilce: "Unfortunately all of this music is very old and hardly any of the students can remember them, it NEEDS TO BE UPDATED! " If it needs to be updated then update it: Comments belong here on talk page please.--IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maidstone Grammar School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160317143949/http://www.debretts.com/people-of-today/profile/81009/Paul-LEWIS to http://www.debretts.com/people-of-today/profile/81009/Paul-LEWIS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maidstone Grammar School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing template messages on Combined Cadet Force Section

Hello all, I believe that the combined cadet force section is in a state where the template messages referring to the lack of sources and academic boosterism are no longer needed. I have removed the template message for lack of sources already. However I wanted to put this in the articles talk section to see if anyone thought otherwise before removing the academic boosterism message. Any objections? Danielgray.me (talk) 16:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]