This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
I expect this to be non-controversial, but want to still accommodate any chance of a discussion here. I am recommending that we move this page to Madhu, as that is the common Vedic Sanskrit, Sanskrit, Hindi, Marathi, Nepali root word on which all these derivatives are based. The current Madhu should be moved to Madhu (disambiguation), as all uses of Madhu listed there derive from this one. It is similar to David and David (disambiguation). --Hunnjazal (talk) 15:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No response as I suspected, since this feels pretty non-controversial. I have moved Madhu to Madhu (disambiguation). Madhu now redirects to this article (currently called Madhura). The next step will be to rename this article to Madhu as that is the root from which all this other stuff is derived. I will do this in a couple of days, but want to leave open the option for anyone that has issues with renaming this to discuss here. --Hunnjazal (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Madhura → Madhu — This article should really be called Madhu, as that is an important root concept from which all these names like Madhur/Madhura/Madhuri/etc are derived. It is the core concept from which all other Madhu references emerge. Madhur continues to be mentioned in a names section in this article. This move is pretty uncontroversial. I've left the discussion up for about a week with no interest. None is expected either.--Hunnjazal (talk) 03:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Agree this is bordering on uncontroversial, but I think you're doing the right thing raising it here and giving a well-presented case. An example to be commended. Andrewa (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
