Talk:Macdonald seamount

Macdonald seamount has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 29, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Macdonald seamount was copied or moved into Macdonald hotspot with this edit on 5 November 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

A fact from Macdonald seamount appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 December 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Macdonald hotspot may have formed numerous volcanoes in the Pacific Ocean as well as the Macdonald seamount, which may become an island in the future?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Macdonald hotspot.

Wikipedia

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seamounts (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seamounts, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SeamountsWikipedia:WikiProject SeamountsTemplate:WikiProject SeamountsSeamounts articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Macdonald seamount/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 13:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria - Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It contains copyright infringements - Copyvio unlikely Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). - Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. - Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Links

No dablinks Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No external links Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

Lede

Is the lack of infobox intentional? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, but infoboxes are not really mandatory. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lede is a little short, things like it's name and location could be better in the lede. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Macdonald seamount is the active expression of Macdonald hotspot" - Seems like jargon to me. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reworded this a bit. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Earthquake activity was recorded in 2007 - a weird simple sentence. I'd merge into sentence before. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
morphology of the volcano - Jargon. Needs a wikilink/explination. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reworded. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

It is also known as Tamarii,[4] while Macdonald appears to be a misspelling. - Should probably explain that you mean the capitalisation of MacDonald. Strickly speaking, it's not a spelling mistake. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it known as Tamarii? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I dunno. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Pacific Ocean is characterized by the long island chains^{[according to whom?]} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Made it less specific. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
These sources are known as "hotspots" and there may be 42–117 in total on Earth. [6] - Seems like a weird range. Is the fact there is between 42 and 117 important? I'd remove. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reworded this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"cracks propagating in the crust" either needs explination/wikilinking - Jargon. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilinked "crust"; "propagating cracks" means exactly what what a layperson would assume it means. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Local setting

Three paragraphs start "Macdonald seamount" in a row. I'd potentially reword the middle one to remove repetition. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced one item. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the paragraphs are pretty short, specifically the first one in Composition. Whilst not really bad, I'd prefer it either at the end of the section, or to be combined into a bigger paragraph. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merged the first and the second. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rest is pretty well written. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes & References

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Adding note that I'll be looking at these tjings tomorrow. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Passing GA. There's very little wrong here, and thanks for changing the things I've mentioned. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]