Talk:Lumi and Pyry

Lumi and Pyry is currently a Politics and government good article nominee. Nominated by NotAGenious (talk) at 20:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lumi and Pyry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: NotAGenious (talk · contribs) 20:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Luiysia (talk · contribs) 19:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written: The article had some copy editing problems, which I went ahead and fixed.

Issue: In the introduction, the sentences "In 2018 there were approximately 2 020 pandas in the wild and about 400 in zoo conditions. Through China's panda diplomacy program, Chinese pandas are on loan in multiple European countries in addition to Finland, including Belgium, Netherlands, Austria and France." are not directly relevant, should be moved to the background section. The panda diplomacy project is worth mentioning but the specific details aren't needed in the lead.

Otherwise, prose is clear and easy to read. Just please address this issue

Verifiable with no original research: All claims are well sourced. Pass

Broad in its coverage: Since the pandas had to be returned, I would appreciate more coverage on the "widespread criticism" that led to this. Additionally, since the end of 2024 has come and gone, if there was news coverage about the return, it should be added. Will pass if this is expanded on.

Neutral: Neutrally written, pass

Stable: No history of edit warring, pass

Illustrated: Article is illustrated, pass

Holding this article until response