Talk:Love Land (China)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on null. The result of the discussion was keep. |
KEEP: I looked up "Love Land" after reading it in legit press. Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia and Human Journal. If the story is a hoax, then it can be documented as such once that is proven. But if it generated enough buzz to warrant discussion, then it should stay.
- If this article survives AfD (as I think it should) for clarity I propose we rename it Love Land (China) in line with the article Love Land (Korea), on the existing Asian Love Land theme park. --Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Love Land (China). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151211043601/http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/china-and-its-neighbors/090519/china-sex-park-long-way-disneyworld to http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/china-and-its-neighbors/090519/china-sex-park-long-way-disneyworld
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)