Talk:Lorica plumata

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lorica plumata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130202021512/http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat.html?func=view&catid=17&id=160220 to http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat.html?func=view&catid=17&id=160220

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Roman Army Talk Forum Really a Reliable Source?

One of the sources for the article is a thread from the Roman Army Talk Forum? Should we really be trusting random people on the internet to be a reliable source on information? I read parts of the thread and they don't even talk about the Lorica Plumata. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewf9h-bg (talk • contribs) 01:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not. GPinkerton (talk) 11:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Ill remove it. Ewf9h-bg (talk —Preceding undated comment added 13:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link

https://www.academia.edu/download/53789677/Wijnhoven_-_The_Ouddorp_Lorica.pdf

It's not on the wayback machine and I have no idea where to find another freely available copy 79.41.225.41 (talk) 10:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]