Talk:List of orogenies
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of orogenies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081019222334/http://home.freeuk.com/gtlloyd/tam/geochron.htm to http://home.freeuk.com/gtlloyd/tam/geochron.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Adjusting table
[edit]I find the table useful as the preponderance of orogenies can, for a host of reasons, be quite confusing. I'm tempted to remove the word 'orogeny' from all of the items in column 1 as being redundant, and to alter the timings in columns 2 and 3 to Ma rather than Ga as that will be more readily meaningful to most readers. I'd note that I came looking for the late Precambrian Avalonian Orogeny but didn't find it, nor the Shelveian orogeny. Geopersona (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see that the Mediterranean Ridge belongs here - is that not simply a feature being formed as part of the ongoing Alpine orogeny? And East Greenland Orogen, currently featured as part of, (but commencing well before) the Caledonian orogeny? Geopersona (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)