Talk:List of fishes of Florida

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fisheries and Fishing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page move

Looking at Category:Lists of fishes, I would suggest List of fishes of Florida. That seems to be the convention, at least of US states. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean Fishingforspecies (talk) 00:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I mean "renaming" this article. Other, similar articles don't use the word species because that's implied. Examples:

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well can you change the name im not sure how toFishingforspecies (talk) 13:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC) And should we just make it "Fish in Florida" or could that confuse people with aquariumsFishingforspecies (talk) 13:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As it is a list article, it should be titled "List of X....". I think the name should follow this convention: Category:Lists of fishes of the United States. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. If there are no objections, I will go ahead and move the page to List of fishes of Florida. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition for adding a length/weight column

We could possibly replace the notes column with size in weight in standard and maybe later in metric

I tooks like it's been changed to "Description". I prefer "Notes" because it allows a broader range of content in the column. Any objections to changing it to "Notes"? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo errors

The same image is used for Sergeant major and for Sheepshead. The picture for Silver mullet is a sheepshead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF99:2080:B501:E604:2B48:9240 (talk) 21:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This list is full of nonsense

@Elmidae and Hyperik: Hope I'm doing this pinging stuff correctly. After figuring out who was responsible for screwing up List of invasive species in Florida, I checked out what else this guy was up to. The serious parts of Wikipedia, you know, the DragonBall Z guys, already got rid of him after a run in 2018, but his science edits, where reality is considered more malleable and subjective, have managed to remain under the radar. I really can't figure out if he was taking the piss, just didn't understand things, or actually seriously believed that Florida was being over-run by electric eels, invasive cocaine plants, pygmy hippos and endangered palms from Madagascar -he spent 6 months adding nonsense to the same few Florida lists every few days.

I already started cleaning up List of reptiles of Florida, but this list is huge and filled with spurious entries, and vetting all this stuff is just tedious. Could it somehow be rewound to a 2017 version? Indignantly pedantic, Leo Breman (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Leo Breman: Urgh. Based on them being the same person who populated Florida with mandrills and birds of paradise, and that four of five spot samples I just took of the fish were Indo-pacific endemics with no recorded introduced populations (#5 was a reasonable tunny) - I think one would be well justified in rolling the article back to before they started adding material. It can't be everybody else's responsibility to sift through mountains of crap for the odd nugget. I'd support a radical revert. (sorry, not active much these past weeks, going to ramp it up again shortly) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 02:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, a couple of his additions were fine, but most isn't and barely anything is sourced -he added a reference to the mainpage of FishBase. Vetting is really a lot of work: take Alewife for instance -it is often sold in tins as baitfish in Florida, but I can't easily tell if it occurs in the state outside of tackle stores -it's probably too warm there. The same behaviour on DragonBall pages got him banned. It makes more sense to just revert to before this guy started, sometime around March/April 2018 I think. It's tricky because he didn't always sign in and edited for long stretches with what I think is a mobile phone IP (which changes). He may also have signed in as someone else in 2017... I plain don't get why someone would do this! I gather you have the power to do a "hard revert", so you'll have to do it. Leo Breman (talk) 14:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

The complete aquarium book; the care and breeding of goldfish and tropical fishes (1936) (20049224674).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

The complete aquarium book; the care and breeding of goldfish and tropical fishes (1936) (20049224674).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]