Talk:List of clashes in the North Caucasus

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Military history: Russian & Soviet

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Russia: Military / Politics and law / Demographics & ethnography

	Russia portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
	This redirect is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.
	This redirect is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.
	This redirect is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Josh Fjelstad (2011-06-22). "The 100 Longest Entries On Wikipedia". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 2014-12-13.

Split long article

Split Article is too long and should be split.--Jax 0677 (talk) 17:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...into what? If you really want a split, say into what. Don't expect to be always taken seriously otherwise. I'd rather suggest to clean out the minor ones with little to no effect

(BTW, the thing misses tons of clashes before 2005 and after 2011.)--R8R Gtrs (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

... I agree with R8R Gtrs. Split into what? It's a list, and it's already split by years, and months. However, I don't think we should clean out the minor ones. Every piece of evidence counts, especially for research. It does need to be updated to include clashes before 2005 and after 2011 as R8R Gtrs suggested --AJ1775 18:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I propose "2005-2007", 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.--Jax 0677 (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? It's already been split up within this article by those years. Except for 2012 which no information has been added, and 2008 needs to be added. Are you suggesting completely different pages for each of those years? If so, that is completely unnecessary. It's already broken up in the content section at the top. All you have to do is just click what you want and it takes you automatically there. I'm fully against splitting this page up. --AJ1775 19:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because… (I can't find a reason for it to be) --178.152.172.74 (talk) 22:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]