Talk:List of building materials

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 July 2012. The result of the discussion was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fasteners?

What about nails and screws? 24.97.230.243 (talk) 17:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question for engineering sorts

I once made a small igloo out of sugar cubes and toothpaste. Can we add these to the list??? --Mashford 12:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Focus of this list

The focus of this list does not seem to be building materials. Many topics listed are building components or systems like dropped ceiling and conveyor systems. Also, the list of categories people are referred are general categories about the named topic, not about materials. The article building material and Category:Building materials are better lists than this. I am not quite sure what to do about it, ask for deletion? Any comments? Jim Derby (talk) 17:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]