This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Recently, Joeyconnick and I have gone back and forth regarding the use of duplicate wikilinks in this list. To summarize the discussion from elsewhere, I argued that duplicate links are acceptable per MOS:DUPLINK, which allows for duplicate links in lists, and that if a wikilink is posted only at the first occurrence, sorting the table will quite likely move the link to a position where the reader cannot easily find it. On the other hand, Joeyconnick argued that the duplicate links violated WP:SEAOFBLUE and that users could easily either reload the page to find the first occurrence in the default-sorted table or scan the table for the link. Since we have very different opinions, I wanted to share our comments with a wider audience to see if anyone had any comments to add to the discussion and help define a clearer consensus. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
