This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Notoriety issues. Not enough independent coverage of most details in the article. Article relies too heavily on NASASpaceflight. If people want these details they should go to NSF. Not sure Wikipedia is the appropriate place for most of the content on this page. As the article goes on the issues get worse, with multiple successive sentences all having the same citaion superscript at the end. At the very least, inline citations should be trimmed down to increase readability. And, where independent sources other than NSF cannot be found for a detail, consideration should be given to omitting the detail entirely. 2603:6011:3E41:3C00:295C:CB5C:C19D:7D95 (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
NSF is a reliable source, and their coverage is enough for something to be notable. Obviously, there isn't a dedicated article for the rollout of a prototype. That would be absurd. But listing "SpaceX claimed that Booster 12 (B12) and S30 were ready to fly on August 8." is both relevent to the article and quite notable (especially due to the fact that it took until October for the IFT-5 vehicles to launch).
.jpg){kind=small}
