Talk:List of P2P protocols

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soulseek protocol used both by soulseekqt (propriatary) and nicotine-plus (open-source), so I think that it should not be in "File transfer protocols used by only one application" category. --Maciej Błędkowski (talk) 16:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aspera (end-to-end) protocol is an instance of P2P protocol? --Krauss (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ActivityPub is P2P?

From my best understanding, ActivityPub doesn't provide any p2p functionality. It has Client-to-Server functionality, as well as Server-to-Server (S2S) functionality. But it's kind of significantly not a p2p protocol. Are we defining p2p in a different way than it's traditionally understood? I feel as though it should be removed from the table, or at least a stipulation should be listed somewhere to clarify for the reader. ShadowLancer (talk) 01:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]