Talk:Lionel Fanthorpe

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Lionel Fanthorpe is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Output

Lionel is unashamed of his huge output - indeed, at the 2006 Discworld convention he said, "I am to great literature, what a tupp'ny upright is to the Kama Sutra"

Until he quotes this in a verifiable form, it will have to (sadly) remain on the Talk page

chrisboote 16:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Achievements?

While working for Badger Books, Fanthorpe wrote "Galaxy 666" under the pseudonym Pel Toro which is described by many as "the worst science fiction book ever written." ( https://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2014/09/a-podcast-im-looking-forward-to-is-based-on-the-worst-novel-ever-published-galaxy-666-by-pel-torro/ ) If you don't believe that reference, do a Google search, you will find many others. Outside of the UK, this is probably the only thing most people know about Lionel Fanthorpe. Should it not be included here?

Is Achievements really a preferable term to use? Perhaps Accomplishments would fit better?

--80.216.218.247 (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He is a horrible, but typical, example of the 'auto-didact'. Those who teach themselves end up with a lot of random facts which they cannot properly correlate and exploit because they always lacked the guidance of a tutor or teacher. They and their works then become the very antithesis of 'learning'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.25.178 (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that he has exploited his acquired knowledge rather well given his circumstances, having become an extensively published author, frequent TV presenter and a successful headmaster in the UK's State sector. That his writing interests lie (apart from alongside the tongue which is clearly often in his cheek) in areas which 81.132.25.178 distains does not make him in any way "horrible." FWIW I can also declare first hand knowledge that he is in person a pleasant and interesting conversationalist. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.12.94.189 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Priest

What does the Church of England think of this turbulent priest? Is he a practising priest? Does he have a parish, or has he had one in the past? What do/did his parishioners make of him? Credulity (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that he is a non-stipendiary minister, so is not paid and does not have a parish. There are clearly different opinions on how seriously non-stipendiary ministers should regard their vocation, and how the church should regard them - here is one view. Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that response! If you read it somewhere, it would be great if you could add the information with a source to the article. Even better would be to hear about his early career and how he got into the ministry. I've added the piece you link to to the article on non-stipendiary priests, and I hope that article will be expanded one day so I can learn more about the place of NSMs in the Church of England. Credulity (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lionel Fanthorpe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lionel Fanthorpe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304044638/http://www.literaturewales.org/writers-of-wales/i/129650/ to http://www.literaturewales.org/writers-of-wales/i/129650/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lionel Fanthorpe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peacocking

In particular, but there are more problems: "the novels are noteworthy for"... "The stories also demonstrate the author's wide knowledge of Fortean subjects"...

The entire "Writing" section feels biased. Unfortunately I'm not sure how best to explain or tag it but the whole section - maybe the whole article - feels more like a man writing out what he perceives to be his own accomplishments with a level of specificity (some unsourced) that might be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I don't think Mr. Fanthorpe doesn't meet the notoriety standard but the article needs to be cut down a bit to significant events and works, and probably needs to see a tone/bias shift as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercury1964 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have resolved these issues. Can we now remove the promotional material message? @Mercury1964: MarcoBooko (talk) 11:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just checking back to see if you agreed we can delete this message? MarcoBooko (talk) 09:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I'll remove it. From what I can tell on the Wikipedia support page for this template, it says if the conversation is dead and you think it's resolved, you can take it off. If anyone has any issues with this at a later date, please comment and we can try and deal with it. MarcoBooko (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peacocking: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Peacocking -- what has clothing got to do with this article? 2A00:23C8:8FB1:F600:999D:C63D:61BD:8FB9 (talk) 09:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]