Jump to content

Talk:Lilium philadelphicum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Confusion regarding Tiger Lily

[edit]

I was confused upon reading this article as to why the name Tiger Lily was never listed, as that is the only name I've ever heard for this flower here in Saskatchewan. I mean, these aren't great sources, but they illustrate my point: [1], [2] both have the usage I am familiar with. This flower isn't even listed at the Tiger lily disambiguation page, and I don't quite understand why. It's obvious to me from reading this that the "actual" tiger lily isn't this flower, just as we have "gophers" that aren't really gophers, but the complete lack of mention struck me as odd and made it harder to be certain I was even at the right article. Is there something obvious I'm missing here, some reason why this isn't considered a tiger lily by the rest of the world? BigNate37(T) 08:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lilium philadelphicum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]