Talk:Lifted condensation level

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: General Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 August 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Lifted condensation level be renamed and moved to Lifting condensation level.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Lifted condensation level → Lifting condensation level – Lifting condensation level is almost ubiquitously the WP:COMMONNAME. Amongst others, the NOAA, articles in the Journal of Atmospheric Science, Oxford Reference and (from what I can tell) all the sources cited use lifting. Whilst not of the highest quality, Google Ngrams shows a clear preference for lifting as well. – Isochrone (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]