Talk:Lifted condensation level
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 30 August 2024
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Lifted condensation level be renamed and moved to Lifting condensation level. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Lifted condensation level → Lifting condensation level – Lifting condensation level is almost ubiquitously the WP:COMMONNAME. Amongst others, the NOAA, articles in the Journal of Atmospheric Science, Oxford Reference and (from what I can tell) all the sources cited use lifting. Whilst not of the highest quality, Google Ngrams shows a clear preference for lifting as well. – Isochrone (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)