Jump to content

Talk:Law and Gospel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Law and ...

[edit]

Where's the Gospel? This article is just about how protestants regard the Law. Or perhaps the article title should be something else? Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 11:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Law and Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Law and Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Should we be linking the word “supercession” to Supercessionism? I would dispute that because the two are the same, and if they are not, it would falsely lead the reader to conclude that the Law-Gospel distinction necessarily implies that one believes in Supercessionism, as though a causative link exists between the two (which many Lutherans and Reformed hold, but not all). Whether or not a causative link is posited to exist, this issue too would require reliable sources. 142.127.187.55 (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

part of a series on Calvinism?

[edit]

This article has a "this article is part of a series on Lutheranism" box. Why doesn't it also have a similar box for Calvinism? 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:10D0 (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]