Talk:Laurus Labs

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What Talk is not for

Talk is not for the insertion of content that does not belong in the article. If editors believe there should be an article about Dr. Chava, then create and submit a draft. David notMD (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PR tag

Prolix, could you explain the PR tag? The content (except for one sentence recently added by a new editor that has been tagged with "citation needed") is factual, neutral and backed by independent, reliable and secondary sources. Here are WP:THREE sources to prove notability: [1] [2] [3]. If you still have "questions" about its notability, please start an AFD. M4DU7 (talk) 08:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that you created Divi's Laboratories article. Most of the sources used on that article are company profiles/shareholding patterns/financial reports, which definitely fit the description of routine coverage. So I'm not entirely sure if you have a firm grasp on guidelines like SIGCOV and CORPDEPTH. M4DU7 (talk) 08:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Scientist at Laurus Labs R&D.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]