Jump to content

Talk:Lassie (1954 TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleLassie (1954 TV series) was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 20, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Merge with Lassie

[edit]

redundant with already same discussion at Talk:Lassie started by the same editor

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This article needs to be merged with Lassie. Lassie was portrayed over several years. There is no reason why any one group of Lassie years needs to have its own article.--Lassiewasadog (talk) 20:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree, again, per same reasons I gave at Talk:Lassie. This is an article about the television series, Lassie is the article about the character across all the series/films, etc. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also per same reasons at Talk:Lassie mainly that Wikipedia is not a directory.--Lassiewasadog (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Nom

[edit]

Came across this article yesterday and was surprised to see an article of this quality was not at least a GA. So I'm going to propose it as one today. Miyagawa (talk) 11:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lassie (1954 TV series)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 16:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am reviewing this article and am impressed with how well written it is. And very interesting. My comments are the following:

  • Why isn't there anything on the actual dogs that played the role of Lassie. How many, where they came from, who trained them etc.
  • There are five fair use images. That is too many for an article. One, or perhaps even two can be justified, but no more than that.

Xtzou (Talk) 16:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The dog information is mostly included in the Lassie article, although in this article it's mostly in the three paragraphs of the casting section. Although I did realize that it was missing from the Characters and Cast section, so I added an additional listing there for dog actors as Lassie. Miyagawa (talk) 19:47, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very good. It is a wonderful article. Just two very minor comments:
    Writers - nothing more to say about who they were other than McCarthyism?
    "Lassie portrait friendship ring based on the one Uncle Petrie fashions for Timmy" - on one of the Uncle Petrie fashions for Timmy?

Xtzou (Talk) 12:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused: }
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Nielsen rankings conflict

[edit]
  1. 13 is listed as the highest ranking in two places, but the table has

1963–1964 #12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.23.172 (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lassie (1954 TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lassie (1954 TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Lassie (1954 TV series)

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Speedily delisted for copyright issues. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another GAR that's a necessity due to Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/ItsLassieTime. After cutting all the content from the article done by all the socks I'm left with less than half the prose, with a lot of significant content long gone. It would take a lot of work to bring it back to GA status. If you're still unconvinced, the GA review was done by a sock of a separate banned user so it's technically invalid anyway. Wizardman 23:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lassie_(1954_TV_series)&oldid=1198517972"