Talk:LW10/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs) 16:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm reviewing this article. I reviewed it for its first GAN, but the nominator wasn't able to address my feedback in a timely fashion. If I find that he addressed everything from the first GAN, I'll probably pass it. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I've gone over the changes made since its last GAN, and it looks good. I'll fill out the template as is my practice, and it should be a simple pass.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The prose was the weakest part of this article; with the changes, it looks much better, and satisfies the GA-criteria.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The nominator followed my suggestions and fixed broken links and seemed to make sure the sources supported the statements made in the article. Again, I'm AGF regarding the "inaccessible" refs.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   My question from the last GAN didn't get answered. As I said, it won't affect its passing, since I realize that this article is about the classification and that it links to articles that discuss sit-skiing more generally. However, would there be a place in this article for more background information about the sport? I'd also like information about individual athletes that have competed in this classification. If you assure me that it's not needed--that it's out of the scope of this article, though, I'll accept it and not insist upon it.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Another question that never got answered, but won't affect its status, since images aren't a requirement for GAs. No images, but that possibly can't be helped. Is there a free image of an LW10 athlete available? Or perhaps you could link a video?

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'm satisfied with this article now; it now fulfills the criteria for GA. Congrats!

Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2013 (UTC)