This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The WSJ thing looks like a press release to me and the others don't seem to be reliable sources (and even if they are, this is not in-depth coverage). Given that you seem to have been around for a while, how come you create stubs without any claim to notability and no independent reliable sources? --Randykitty (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In my humble opinion, all the companies listed on the two major American stock exchanges (NYSE and Nasdaq) deserve an article just for being listed there; said that, the company has been the subject of independent articles on notable specialized websites. I admit I've been too hasty in writing the article but a stub is just that, a brief description. A Google search for L&L Energy yields thousand of results.--Itemirus (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This action arises out of a fraudulent scheme by L&L Energy and Dickson Lee to create the appearance that L&L was run by a professional management team and conceal Lee’s single-handed control of the company. L&L Energy is a Seattle-headquartered coal company with all of its operations in China and Taiwan. 203.186.110.162 (talk) 04:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]