Talk:Kosi River

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Bihar / Geography Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Nepal High‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Added link to dissambiguation. Ixtli 21:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC) and textiles are annoying | plus add potatoes to your story and just tell us not and whot we want — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.189.2 (talk) 19:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kosi river

This article which was enlarged by me has been substantially mutilated and the revised version does not even accept the contribution of the earlier authors in the history column. External references have been missed (numbers are very much there but there are no refereces or are not shown). There is no continuity of references. Also, one of the pictures which I have uploaded on Kosi's shifting courses does not open eventhough the title of the photo is displayed in red colour. What has happened? Can some one tell me what is happening? And where is the disambaguated article enlarged by me? There is not even mention of my contribution eventhoguh substantial part of my artcle (90% of it) has been utilised.--Nvvchar (talk) 18:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many quite well-prepared English-speaking readers won't recognize the Ganga, which is always called the Ganges in English.--Wetman (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV check on "2008 flood in Bihar" section

The "2008 flood in Bihar" section contains blatant accusations, in the form of statements followed by immediate contradictions to those statements, that make it appear as though a page author is using this page as a soapbox for their side in a dispute. I have marked the section for a POV check. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Darrow (talk • contribs) 04:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your view. The section on "2008 Floods in Bihar" should be deleted from this section and the linked new article on "2008 Indian Floods" also needs editing to wiki standards. However, a few lines at the end of the previous section " Floods of Koshi River - The Sorrow of Bihar" should be added stating that "The 'Curse of Kosi' has made a repeat act of a catastrophic and devastating impact, during the floods of August 2008, on about 2 million people of the region by shifting its river course to an old channel. The devastation is reported to be of immense proportions and the catastrophe has been declared a national disaster and rescue and relief operations have been rushed to the affected area".--Nvvchar (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Minister reacts to NYT reporting?

New York Times reported that it was the worst flood in the area in 50 years,which prompted the Prime Minister of India to declare it a “national calamity” on August 28. I read this to mean that the Indian Prime Minister reacted to New York Times reporting on the subject. Surely the prime minister would have called this a national disaster without the NYT story. This sounds like pretty dubious causation. Hughdbrown (talk) 20:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes, sir. You are right. Amended now.--Nvvchar (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Indo-Nepal border" or "Indo-Nepalese border" ?

I'm curious whether the article's grammar —relating to the names of countries— need be corrected. Instead of "Indo-Nepal", perhaps the noun modifier would be either "India/Nepal" or "Indo-Nepalese."

What do you think? Pine (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Koshi River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Koshi River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]