Jump to content

Talk:Kongō-class destroyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kongo or Kongou

[edit]

Should the name of the class be Kongou or Kongo ? Jane's has Kongou. Megapixie 10:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have changed the other classes accordingly. So if it's "Kongo" you should change the others back. If it's "Kongou" you need to change the others. Personally I would change the others back, as "Kongo" is what people generally refer to them as. Also "Kongo" is what was used for WWII-era ships. I think it's best to go back to the old system for the others - if you don't mind doing that. John Smith's 13:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
MMmmmm tricky. "Kongo class destroyer" gets 20,000 ghits where as "Kongou class destroyer" only gets about 100. "Yuushio class submarine" gets 50 hits, where as "Yushio class submarine" gets 250. I have it on reasonably good authority that Kongou is the more correct Romanji, and what Jane's refers to the class as - but Kongo appears to be the name that is more widely in use. How about about:
The Kongo class (こんごう; Kongou) of guided missle... (article name = Kongo, redirect from Kongou)
The Yushio (ゆうしお; Yuushio) is a Japanese diesel-electric submarine... (article name = Yushio, redirect from Yuushio)
Megapixie 12:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. But have the shorter versions as the article title. The correct romaji next to the hiragana is adequate. John Smith's 13:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Question

[edit]

Because of being built to merchant standards rather than military, the Kongō-class ships' internal arrangement is quite different from that of the Arleigh Burke-class ships on which their design is based.

what the hell does "merchant Standards" mean? --Paladin 17:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's false and probably a misinterpretation of a certain change in design. Unlike US Navy's Aegis system equipped ships, Kongo-class ships are expected to serve as a flagship and command a squadron on its own. So these ships have rooms for holding a briefing and carrying extra staffs on board. They are built with military specifications almost exactly the same with US military specs. I'll fix it. --Revth (talk) 08:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kongō-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kongō-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]