Talk:Kitepower

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Untitled

Comment of this major contributor: I added mostly references to the statements in this article, included also a remark about challenges that the technology is facing and improved the language. I would assume that all these contributions add to the quality of the article? E.g. the lacking secondary references were a point of criticism. Let me know please how to best address this. I do understand the COI issue but scientific quality is also an important goal. If someone else is willing to do this, great!

Hi, thank you for your contributions. The COI tag is only to notify there could be a possible conflict of interest. Once the article is checked for neutral point of view the tag can be removed. --Ita140188 (talk) 23:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is the buzzword tag still relevant for this article? I can not find any words that would qualify as buzzwords, the tone of the article is quite technical and factual now, in my humble opinion. Could someone please have a look? Rschmehl (talk) 14:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]