Talk:Killington Ski Resort

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

reasons for the shorter ski season

regarding this edit: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Killington_Ski_Resort&curid=2891319&diff=95809354&oldid=93701070 I am going to remove it because it's not true. The global warming argument is debatable anyway, but that's not what I'm talking about - Even on a good winter, the mountain would still close early because management doesn't make 40-ft piles of snow on superstar anymore - in other words, ASC is not committed to opening super-early or closing super-late.

merge with killington, vermont site

I think this has been copied from The Killington Website. --Eklapper 01:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest to move this as a chapter to the Killington, Vermont site. No need to keep separate sites and duplicate a lot of the information. Ekem 22:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this should be a merge as User:Sjorford indicated. Ekem 11:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - its pretty short and really belongs in the Killington, Vermont article. ww2censor 19:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Maybe in the process we could make it read less like a brochure uFu 14:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The town Killington, Vermont, the peak Killington Peak and the resort all deserve their own articles, however they ought to just See also rather than duplicate information. ProveIt ^(talk) 18:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as above. Right now both are smallish articles. As they grow they will duplicate less and less information. By the logic of this proposal, should Walt Disney World be merged with Orlando, Florida, too? —BenFrantzDale 04:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as previously written. The ski area article is rapidly becoming more ski area specific—see other ski area articles here. Presumably the town portion will become more cultural, historic, athletic, civic, etc. as it grows. —EncMstr 00:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as previously written in the statements posted above. This article has vastly changed; before, it was rather small and duplicated information with Killington, Vermont but now it has morphed into a ski-specific article with sufficient ski-related information.--68.118.193.116 00:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge is withdrawn as article has evolved as discussed.Ekem 12:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it says that proposal to merge is withdrawn last year, then why does it still say on the article that it has been suggested that Sunrise Mountain to be merged with the Killington article? Are users still suggesting merge? NHRHS2010^Talk 04:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned Up Ad Speak

I revamped the main section of the article to get read of all the marketing jargon. The lodging and restaurants seemed to be the worst section, most of it was advertising, so I trimmed it down to the basics. I'm not a skiier, so someone who is more familiar with Killington may want to do some further cleanup.

65.120.75.6 (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Tim[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Killingtonnew.jpg

Image:Killingtonnew.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

season length

The season averages over 200 days, with the max season being about 250. As of April 14, 2018, they are only at day 158 and may be closing by early May, partially to get started on summer construction season improvements, but also the base is pretty low and the forecast is well above freezing for late April. In ski country, there have been several recent seasons by far among the worst, with two winters in a row so warm even snow making was difficult. B137 (talk) 01:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]