Talk:Kilburn

Move

Not sure what prompted deletion of the disambig page, and move of "Kilburn" -> "Kilburn, London". The move created over a 100 references to a disambiguation page, and only one was a mistaken reference to the wrong Kilburn. I thought primary use was always the criteria - not always disambiguate - as people seeking the primary usage are now required an extra click. Seems a little strange to create unnecessary work for others. cheers Kbthompson (talk) 12:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A user from Kilburn, Derbyshire unilaterally moved pages arounbd so that the main Kilburn page pointed to that village instead. Some admins stepped in and as a result it defaults to a disambiguation. I agree that it's a bad idea. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 12:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - if I'd known that, I would have moved it back. The 'links to disambiguation pages' are fixed for now, but I think it likely that instances of Kilburn will continue to be added back. I'll let it be at the momemnt - rather than being BOLD - maybe there'll be some more comments here. If there's a definite consensus, I will move it, again. cheers Kbthompson (talk) 08:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kilburn, London which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kilburn, London which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]