The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
Users are removing/revising edits to this article that cite news reports that debunk or oppose a viral narrative of 40 beheaded babies being discovered in this settlement. Previous versions of the article include citations referring to direct interviews with Israeli Army officials stating that they have no confirmation of such accounts.
Rather than fight over phrasing on the article I have simply removed the original dubious reference and warned the relevant editors over their article vandalism for revising prior versions of this article without citation or substantiation for their claims of fake news and anti-Semitism. 2601:644:8584:2800:31EB:8517:D80A:4D8B (talk) 00:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article is is heavily weighing towards one side of a controversy and has no real historical data on the establishment of the kibbutz. Instead it is evident that it is written exactly for putting through an one-sided view on a controversial fact that has not yet been fully investigated and given the fact that the impacted side is the one with the power over press and judiciary authorities, I'm inclined to believe that it will never be further investigated. Proposing to balance the article with more data as to the how the kibbutz was established, main events that happened throughout its 72 year history what it produced and how it was run. You only imply that the first inhabitants were in fact trained soldiers but say nothing more on that. 141.237.3.47 (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
