Talk:Ken Livingstone/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 18:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Midnightblueowl (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 18:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
Check for WP:BLP:
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google.)
![]() Check for WP:RS:
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
Midnightblueowl, I'm very happy and inspired to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
I think the first sentence of the lead can be improved.1a issue: "the reduction of the age of consent for male same-sex activity from 21 to 16, in line with the different-sex age of consent consent.[52]"1a issue: "In 1979, internal crisis rocked Labour as activists organised as the Campaign for Labour Democracy struggled with the Parliamentary Labour Party for a greater say in party management.[54] Livingstone joined the activists' side, on 15 July 1978 helping unify small hard left groups as the Socialist Campaign for a Labour Victory (SCLV)" It can be more clear, I think. Should it be "activists' side" or simply "activists"? The sentence involving "as activists organised as" can be more clear. Also, the timeline for this part starts from 1979, goes to 1978 and again comes to 1979, rendering this part a bit difficult to follow.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Please feel free to strike out any recommendation from this review which you think will not help in improving the article which is our main aim here. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Right Seabuckthorn, I've made the necessary corrections. Thank you so much for undertaking this GAR - it is much appreciated ! Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
--Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Seabuckthorn; much appreciated! Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)