Talk:Kazi Nazrul Islam/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 23:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: two found, one fixed, the other, Sundarpur, needs sorting out as it could refer to several targets in India and Nepal.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: three found and fixed.[2] Jezhotwells (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The prose is very poor throughout with ungrammatical constructions, abbreviations and poor word choice. It is quick-failed on that alone. Please get it copy-edited by someone who has a good command of plain English, then get it peer reviewed before renomination. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I am quick-failing this because the prose is nowhere near GA standard. Please ensure that articles meet the criteria before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.