Talk:Kathy Martin (scientist)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kathy Martin (scientist) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Birds Low‑importance

Kathy Martin (scientist) is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Dawn Bazely (October 8, 2018). "Why Nobel winner Donna Strickland didn't have a Wikipedia page". Washington Post. Retrieved October 14, 2018. I made an entry for Kathy Martin, current president of the American Ornithological Society and a global authority on arctic and alpine grouse.

Sourcing problems

Much of this article's content was either unsourced or wasn't about Martin and based on sources that don't mention her. I have removed much of that, but more work is needed. Furthermore, many of the sources that do mention Martin are primary sources; Wikipedia content should be based on secondary sources, particularly for assessments of the subject's significance. Huon (talk) 18:14, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: my apologies for not getting back sooner. I am sending a belated thank you for your time and attention on the Kathy Martin (scientist) webpage, which is much improved thanks to your editing. Best wishes, Carries mum (talk) 18:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please review for removal of Twinkle Banner

Hello @Melcous, I assigned this wikipedia page about an ecologist as an assignment in an ecology course. Students read, and suggested edits to improve neutrality. They agreed that Prof. Martin meets the Wikipedia Academic Notability Requirements and proposed language changes to remove what could be interpreted as promotional language, that I have implemented. I am writing to let you know that the students consider that the page no longer requires a Twinkle alert. best wishes, Dawnbazely (talk) 17:05, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dawnbazely they do not seem to have understood the issue then. I have made some further edits, but the work that remains to be done includes taking the list under the heading "Service to Academia" (which is still very much written like a resume), and turning it into a prose section in chronological order with a more neutral title, with each item properly referenced to a reliable source. See also WP:LEAD as to what should and should not be in the opening section. Melcous (talk) 23:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your edits and feedback which I will pass on to students who did the Wikipedia training and editing assignments in my last year's courses. I will assign this as an assignment next year. Also, thank you for your contributions to the Wiki Women in Red project, best wishes, Dawnbazely (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]