Jump to content

Talk:Karnataka Express

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karnataka Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit warring

[edit]

LeoFrank I think you're applying WP:NOTTRAVEL incorrectly. It reads: An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. The content you keep removing does not fall under this. Simply being about transport does not mean something violates NOTTRAVEL. As for your notability argument, WP:N discusses whether something should have its own article. It is not about whether something should be included on an existing page. NemesisAT (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NemesisAT, Your understanding is completely wrong of WP:NOTTRAVEL. How is the coach composition of a train, the locomotive used to haul the train, the average speed it traverses important? Coach composition is only for passengers who need to travel in the train. Locomotive and speed are for rail enthusiasts. So, it's basically a combination of WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:FANSITE.  LeoFrank  Talk 13:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of people clearly do think route and locomotive information is important. Look at articles like Northern Trains. You are taking a subjective view here. Are station articles and rail route articles only for rail enthusiasts too? NemesisAT (talk) 13:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]