Talk:Kalīla wa-Dimna

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: Literature

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup.
	This article was last assessed in February 2019.

Wiki Education assignment: Art of the Book

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 February 2024 and 14 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NancyHarraz (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by NancyHarraz (talk) 11:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

کلیلہ و دمنہ یا خرد افروز از سراج الدین :باب ٦ دشمنوں کےکاروبارودنیا کے سوچنے اور ان کے فریب سے نڈر رہنے

اس پر content چاہیے 144.48.130.208 (talk) 13:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

undo

User:Fram, I speak Arabic and can read Persian, we don't pronounce it as "Dimna" but rather as "Domna". Anyways, why did you not just change my "o" to "i" instead of reverting my whole edit? Did you have to turn it to an edit war?! ☆SuperNinja2☆ TALK! 15:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your or my personal knowledge has no importance here, we go with the WP:COMMONNAME in reliable sources. Fram (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You could have changed the "o" into an "i" instead of reverting my edit as a whole, right? ☆SuperNinja2☆ TALK! 19:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the title? No, these were already taken by redirects which I couldn´t override. And in any case when there is disagreement, it´s better to go back to the old situation and start a formal discussion. Fram (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]