Talk:Jurassic Park (SNES video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Merger

A merger has been proposed by an anonymous user to combine information from the "(NES)", "(SNES)" and "(Sega video game)" articles of this game into a single article titled "Jurassic Park (video game)". AJFU (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: These three separate articles probably won't grow any further. Merging them into one article seems like it may be more convenient than having three separate articles. AJFU (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. All of the games named "Jurassic Park" are all distinctly different games with different gameplay and different story lines. Best to leave them separate. Steel1943 (talk) 19:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ditto User:Steel1943 Deunanknute (talk) 15:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I felt inspired to combine the three articles into a sandbox article. I think the three articles could do well if they were merged. I feel that the information is better when its grouped together. I just want to point out also that the three games do not have different storylines - InGenuine (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Games on EBay

The article states "In May 2015, approximately 300 copies of the game were listed for sale at a "Buy It Now" price of $1,500 on eBay." This sentence gave me the impression that each copy of the game costs $1,500 but the source says that the 300 games together cost $1,500 which makes a pretty big difference. Also, why is it noteworthy when some dude decided to sell his games collection? 77.1.86.195 (talk) 12:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reworded the sentence to be more specific. And it was noteworthy enough to receive the attention of Kotaku (the game website that reported it), I guess because it's 300 copies of the exact same game. It's a unique and oddly specific collection. AJFU (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jurassic Park (SNES video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160918102205/http://www.gamefaqs.com/snes/588410-jurassic-park/data to http://www.gamefaqs.com/snes/588410-jurassic-park/data

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]