Talk:Juniata River

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Favorite Vacation Spot

My family has been visiting the river (Riddlesburg/Saxton Area) for a long time. If there are any pictures/information I can provide, please ask. --Cngodles 13:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raystown Branch/Frankstown Branch/Little Juniata

I'm looking for a little local knowledge here. The National Hydrography Dataset, the Geographic Names Information System, and the 7.5-minute topo map series all show the Juniata beginning at the junction the Little Juniata River and the Frankstown Branch, northwest of Huntingdon. The 100,000-scale topo map shows the Little Juniata continuing downstream through Huntingdon and joining the Raystown Branch at Ardenheim to form the Juniata there. Finally, the Board on Geographic Names' decision card (from 1939) also puts the start of the river at Ardenheim but indicates that that is the confluence of the Frankstown and Raystown branches.

To me, the BGN's decision card makes the most sense (the two named branches joining to create main stem), but the published USGS maps haven't followed that nomenclature. Does anybody familiar with the Huntingdon area have any light they can shed on this? (You can see the BGN's decision card on the GNIS website: U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: Juniata River.) Thanks, --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No local knowledge here, but it looks to me like the 1939 decision card matches the 1st definition (Juniata forming at the Little Juniata and Frankstown) while its the older 1937 decision that has the Juniata forming at the two branches, in which case everything agrees except the 100k topo. Kmusser (talk) 20:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I need to learn how to navigate my downloads window in my web browser! I think I looked at the 1937 card twice. The 1939 decision, as you say, confirms the locations given everywhere except the 100k map. Thanks for the second pair of eyes. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juniata River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]