Jump to content

Talk:Julie Ertz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJulie Ertz has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2018Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 6, 2020, and April 6, 2022.

Good article, TNKS

[edit]

Thanks for the work on this article, well done. Pictures are good. Click on 'images' under a Google-search for more pictures. -- AstroU (talk) 22:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC) -- PS: I'll be 'watching' and helping edit.[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Julie Ertz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julie Ertz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Julie Ertz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 08:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take a look at this one, will post review in the next day or so. Kosack (talk) 08:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review:

Infobox

[edit]
  • Source needed for her full name and height.
  • The manual of style at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players would suggest not to use hyphens when displaying national youth teams in the infobox, I.e. U-20 > U20.

Lead

[edit]
  • Per WP:PRECISELANG, avoid using terms such as "currently" that can become out of date. She plays as would be more suitable.
  • I think it's typical for the club to come before the country when listing who the player represents.
  • Link friendly to Exhibition game.
  • Link final to 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup Final.
  • Currently used again in the third paragraph, try and swap that out.

Early life

[edit]
  • Perhaps I'm missing it, but what's the source for her being raised by her sister?
  • "Johnston sisters switched to play for Sereno Soccer Club in Phoenix Julie played for the 92's and Melanie played for the 90's.", this sentence needs a break somewhere, perhaps a comma after Phoenix would help?
  • I'm assuming 92's and 90's refer to the year the players were born?
  • The comma after professional teams isn't needed.
  • The birthplaces don't match between the Infobox and Early Life.

Santa Clara Broncos

[edit]
  • "Ertz started all 21 games which led the Broncos with nine goals and four assists", sentence is a bit confusing, did the 21 games or the goals and assists lead the team?
  • NSCAA is linked in the second paragraph but there is a mention in the first, link the first mention instead.

Chicago Red Stars

[edit]
  • Link Chicago Red Stars, first time the team is mentioned outside the lead.
  • I've never seen that win-loss record template used before, is that standard for US women's articles?
  • Link FIFA Women's World Cup to the relevant World Cup page.
  • "She made 11 appearances for the Red Stars during the 2015 season, playing 990 minutes. The Red Stars finished second in the regular season with a 8–3–9 record and advanced to the playoffs.", what's the source for these two sentences?
  • Third paragraph is unsourced.
  • First sentence of the fourth paragraph is unsourced.

Youth national teams

[edit]

First caps

[edit]
  • Link national team to the USWNT.
  • Link Scotland to Scotland women's national football team.
  • Canada women's team is linked in the third paragraph but not the second. Move the link to the first mention.
  • Does qualifying need the capital letter in the fourth paragraph?

2015 FIFA Women's World Cup

[edit]
  • Link French and Japanese women's teams.

Honours

[edit]
  • First honour is unsourced.

References

[edit]
  • Refs 75, 76 and 77 need an author.

That's all I've found for now. Placed on hold. Kosack (talk) 14:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iggy the Swan: Hi, this has been on hold for over a week now, has any progress been made? Kosack (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kosack: - I forgot to mark these as  Done, this edit shows what I've done to it so far. Iggy (Swan) 10:02, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Iggy the Swan: Have you got more to do or is this ready for another look? Kosack (talk) 15:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kosack: - ready for another look. I have checked this carefully, believing that a good number of points over the review has been checked and ticked. Iggy (Swan) 16:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up review

[edit]

Infobox

[edit]
  • Still need a source for her height.
  • The birthplaces don't match in the Infobox and the Early Life.

Honours

[edit]
  • "MAC Hermann Trophy Semi-finalist", I'm not acquainted with American sports that much but is being a semi-finalist an honour?

References

[edit]
  • The U.S. Soccer website references are formatted in three different ways, U.S. Soccer, US Soccer and ussoccer. Maintain one style for consistency. Only appears to affect refs 85 onwards.
  • Ref 87 needs a publisher and access date.
  • Refs 86 and 88 need a publisher.
All  Done with these points. I have never seen an honour which lists a semi-finalist as this is nothing of a major trophy for instance unlike the winner's trophy in leagues/cups. That has been removed. Iggy (Swan) 10:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A handful of minor issues to sort, nothing major, and this is ready for promotion I think. Kosack (talk) 06:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy that this meets the GA criteria following the issues that were fixed above. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Main Image

[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Julie_Ertz_2019_Friendly.png#%7B%7Bint%3Alicense-header%7D%7D Should we put this image as the main image as the old one is from 3 years ago while this is from 1 year? Or anyone else have a good picture that is more recent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timetorockknowlege (talkcontribs) 04:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3 years isn't a long time for an adult and she doesn't look significantly different from 2017. If we are going to update the pic though, I'd pick one that's a little less askew and a JPEG (PNGs are flatter, less sharp and take longer to load), like File:Julie Ertz vs New Zealand 2019-05-16.jpg. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]