Jump to content

Talk:Julie Croteau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photos of Julie Croteau are needed

[edit]

Due to Wikipedia policy changes, photos of are needed of her that have no copyright (or re-use) restrictions whatsoever.

When uploading her photos. please include a description with her name, or no one will be able to do a search for it.

Upload here-- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard

Many thanks! :-)

Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 02:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Julie Croteau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 17:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

[edit]

Playing and coaching career

[edit]

Professional baseball

[edit]

USA Baseball

[edit]

Personal life

[edit]

References

[edit]

General comments

[edit]
  • No photos to address
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks good

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 22:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: comments responded to. Therapyisgood (talk) 23:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for making those changes! Everything looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 16:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Maile66 (talk01:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Therapyisgood (talk). Self-nominated at 22:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting article and interesting hook. Article meets all the criteria, as does the hook, and I see no reason not to approve. JJonahJackalope (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JJonahJackalope: I've reworded the hook a bit and added an explanatory note to the article. The hook needs a re-review. Therapyisgood (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, explanatory note works and I see no reason not to approve this new hook. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Therapyisgood and JJonahJackalope: mind if I yoink this for March 8 (International Women's Day)? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 11:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have no issue with that if the dyk nominator doesn't. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No issue. Therapyisgood (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note:Actually promoted to Prep by SL93

"becoming the first women to play in a Major League Baseball-sanctioned league."

[edit]

Wouldn't this be someone like Toni Stone with the recognition of the Negro Leagues as a major league? Therapyisgood (talk) 03:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]