Talk:Josh Dies

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Does Josh Dies really need his own article? Danielbot 07:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is worthwhile, but I don't really know how his on stage persona can be compared to people as various as Mick Jager and Marilyn Manson. I mean, seriously. If you want to compare him to random people (pulls out Teen People) lets say Britney Spears and 50 Cent.

who wrote this?

i think josh wrote it himself. anyone agree? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Youhadmeatgoodbye (talk • contribs) 02:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It's clear he wrote this himself. What are our sources for the "controversy"? Or anything for that matter? All the sources point to his own website and the only reference to any controversy with Christians that I can find is just him talking about it. It's not like religious groups are out picketing over the release of his books or music. I am not sure this belongs on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.76.5.56 (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Expansion

As a singer, songwriter, and novelist, this article needs to be expanded. I also suggest adding a picture (if there are any serious ones). 72.251.1.73 22:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A serious picture of him? That's gunna be hard. http://myspace-100.vo.llnwd.net/01963/00/19/1963879100_thumb1.jpg ? IronCrow 04:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article should come down. It's clearly the work of the author using it to promote himself. Do we really believe that fans are scratching their heads at his superior vocabulary? Where's the source for that? This is the work of Josh "Dies" Porter. Wikipedia is not a social network nor should it be used for guerilla marketing. I don't think this article belongs here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.76.5.56 (talk) 18:53, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Josh Dies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061024001402/http://www.showbread.net/journal.php to http://www.showbread.net/journal.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]