Talk:Josephine Flood

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Archaeology: Women in archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women in archaeology task force.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Josephine Flood is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have rewritten the longer passages of duplicate text - some of these however are just titles of publications and organisation, and others are simply logical phrases - e.g."more than 2000 Aboriginal sites on the Register of the National Estate". Garyvines (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio

I thought I had pretty much gotten rid of any copyright text and applied the duplication detector to the result, which showed only three word strings and references;, but I have now rewritten the sections at issue and reposted the article here Talk:Josephine Flood/Temp as instructed.Garyvines (talk) 10:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reworking the text. Copyright issues go beyond precise duplication - Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing may be helpful reading here. We can inadvertently come too close to our sources when we modify sentences incrementally instead of, as requested, rewriting from scratch. I have modified a bit further but believe that what we have now is not an issue for copyright.

However, it does have some issues with sourcing. The bulk of sources cited in this article are primary sources, authored by Flood herself or by entities connected to her (the university where she taught). Wikipedia's content is meant to be primarily based on secondary and tertiary sources. We prefer sources that are subjected to scrutiny and review before publication and that are respected and widely trusted as reliable and neutral. I have altered the language "Flood is credited with" as the source cited for that information is Flood herself. If Flood is credited with this discovery (and she may well be) by others, please cite the sources that indicate as much. I have also flagged that source 10 may not meet our requirements for sourcing; please see identifying reliable sources. While we do sometimes cite websites created and owned by individuals, we generally need to establish that they are respected experts in the field.

Citations

This is not specifically related to sourcing, but I have removed the names of her children in accordance with WP:BLP. Being written about on Wikipedia can be a mixed blessing, and it is our policy not to include the names of family members who are not themselves notable, in respect for their privacy. See WP:BLPNAME. If these family members are widely reported in reliable sources, this presumption of privacy does not apply. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found some better sources for the {verify credibility} tagged paragraph, so I removed this tag, as well as better source for the mountaineering section - were there other secondary sources needed or can we remove the {Primarysources} tag too?.Garyvines (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On balance, probably better to let someone else do that. I've removed a couple of sources that don't seem to me WP:RS, and also the sentence about the 20000 m mountains! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a couple of new citations, - just looking for an independent confirmation that her husband was a diplomat. There is also more to add on the mountaineering side from a couple of these, but that is for later.Garyvines (talk) 00:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added further references - 16 in total now, so Unless I hear dissent, I will remove the {Primarysources} tag since no one else is editing this article. Garyvines (talk) 05:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]