Talk:Jonathan Goble
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
On 4 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Jonathan Scobie to Jonathan Goble. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Move
[edit]Both of the listed sources call him Jonathan Goble. --99.197.202.188 (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 4 March 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) đ¶ EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 01:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Jonathan Scobie â Jonathan Goble â All of the sources and Authority Control links say Goble, also see https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Jonathan+Goble%2CJonathan+Scobie&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2CJonathan%20Goble%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CJonathan%20Scobie%3B%2Cc0 99.197.202.188 (talk) 23:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support per the title of the book used in reference #2. How is he named in reference #1? GoingBatty (talk) 04:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- @GoingBatty: He is called "Jonathan Goble" with no mention of "Scobie". â Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.197.202.188 (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, however a redirect page needs to be kept in the former page. Pavlov2 (talk) 06:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Will the page be moved, and if so when? (Sorry, I'm not very familiar with the move request process; BTW I'm the OP) --Wikipedian who edited with an IP for a while (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.