Talk:Jet-Set (magazine)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jet-Set (magazine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
wrong jetset magazine=
[edit]Untitled
[edit]How is this magazine even credible enough for wikipedia? The actual Jetset Magazine [1] is far more credible with sources in forbes, extra, warner brothers, and more.
70.184.104.106 (talk) 21:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Well first of all, as seemingly impossible as it seems to you, there can be more than one article, magazine or thing with the same name, that is why wikipedia has disambiguation pages and that is why this article reminds readers to check it out atop of the page. Secondly this article is about the magazine itself as a company and a publication, whether its credible enough or not that is another matter altogether as this article is not citing itself, wikipedia also has an article about Jack the Ripper, and Enron not that I would find them credible (person and company). Lastly you are making a comparison between this magazine and Jetset (magazine), the american publication, which makes no sense or difference as again both can coexist in the same universe and the credibility or existence of one does not reflect on the other. Furthermore, you can create the article for the other publication if you want to instead on complaining about the existence of the other.... mijotoba (talk) 16:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
References
- ^ www.jetsetmag.com