Talk:Jeremy Gardiner

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Frank Opinions (talk · contribs)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20121006233645/http://www.kingsplace.co.uk/jeremy-gardiner-unfolding-landscape-0 or some common source; and probably others too. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In case there's any doubt about this: text added to the lead of the article on 8 January 2013 read:

... spatially probing and texturally explicit pictures creatively transform the lessons learnt from pioneering modern British landscape painters such as John Tunnard, Ben Nicholson, Peter Lanyon and the American artist Richard Diebenkorn

while the presumed source, archived on 6 October 2012, read:

... spatially probing and texturally explicit pictures creatively transform the lessons learnt from pioneering modern British landscape painters such as Tunnard, Ben Nicholson, Peter Lanyon and the American artist Richard Diebenkorn

The artist's website also carries the same text, but is apparently not archived through archive.org. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Frank Opinions (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC) I have completely re-written it.[reply]

You now need to cite each and every fact to a reliable third party source. Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I have updated the article with additional references and believe it is now balanced and encyclopedic enough to remove the COI notice. More work would be welcome of course! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]