Jump to content

Talk:Japanese battleship Settsu/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Probably best to link Battle of Tsingtao, Washington Naval Treaty again in the body.
    What type of ship was Tosa?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Gotta love Japanese copyright law for these ships.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just a couple quibbles here and there, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]