Talk:Jaggaer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jaggaer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I am about to submit the OTRS request right now. I work for SciQuest and have authorization to use our history page (in a non-advertising fashion) on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missionispossible (talk • contribs) 17:06, 10 February 2014

Hi, you need to submit OTRS requests before writing the article, or explicitly state the rights release on the website the information is coming from. The article would/has been deleted anyway per Criteria G11 as it was written like an advertisement. Articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This is, after all, an encyclopedia, not an advertising platform. Samwalton9 (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...the company is the largest public, pure-play company in the eProcurement space. Much smaller, private companies in this space have Wikipedia pages. SQI is publicly traded on NASDAQ. No comments are biased or persuasive. Everything is written neutrally and factually. References have been included, discussing (from 3rd party analysts and publications) what has been going on with SciQuest acquiring other companies (4 in 3 years). That is what makes SQI notable. For notable occurrences of SciQuest: https://spendmatters.com/tag/sciquest/ http://www.mypurchasingcenter.com/technology/technology-articles/sciquests-new-look-modern/ http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/sqi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missionispossible (talk • contribs) 17:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References added throughout and all is written based on facts found in third party articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missionispossible (talk • contribs) 15:46, 11 February 2014

Removing talk page content

On a User Talk page users have virtually free reign (with some exceptions) to remove content and comments of others. On an article talk page like this no such free reign exists. The talk page of an article is meant to show a history of the conversations that have taken place. All users should add their comments to the bottom of the page and should sign their comments with four tildes (like this: ~~~~). I have spent some time rebuilding this discussion to preserve as a record per WP:TPOC. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance Template removal

I have removed the template as per the guidelines, as there seems to be no COI issue by now. Zezen (talk) 07:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]