Talk:It Ain't Easy Being Breezies

It Ain't Easy Being Breezies was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 20, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

My Little Pony

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject My Little Pony, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of My Little Pony related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.My Little PonyWikipedia:WikiProject My Little PonyTemplate:WikiProject My Little PonyMy Little Pony articles

Animation: American / Canadian / Television

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
	This redirect is supported by the American animation work group.
	This redirect is supported by the Canadian animation work group.
	This redirect is supported by the Animated television work group.

Canada: Television

	Canada portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United States: Animation / Television

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	Animation portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This redirect is supported by American television task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:It Ain't Easy Being Breezies/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 11:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. Expect a review within 7-10 days; ping if I let it get past that. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few tweaks to add some bluelinks in the lead. Also tweaked the wording in the plot summary somewhat for clarity.
Upon reviewing the sourcing, I am concerned that there isn't enough reliable significant coverage to justify keeping this as a standalone article, let alone meeting the GA criteria about broad coverage. The EW article is a two-paragraph preview/promo blurb that doesn't really contain any critical commentary about the episode. Unleash the Fanboy looks to me like any number of non-professional fan-run blogs that are not usually taken as reliable sources for notability purposes. The content in Art of Equestria is a short paragraph about the design of the breezies. I did my best to look for additional reviews / critical commentary, but I didn't find anything except for fan forums and blog reviews. So even if we accept Unleash as a reliable source, one significant source is not sufficient. Is there any additional critical coverage available? This is especially important as the article lead claims the episode was "was positively received due to [a bunch of factors]" but only has one actual review. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pamzeis, pinging you in case you didn't preemptively watchlist the GA page and didn't see this. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, PMC. Would it be OK if I withdrew this nomination? Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 00:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I have no objection to redirecting this article.

Re-ping: Premeditated Chaos. Pamzeis (talk) 00:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem with withdrawing. I've added the failed GA template and redirected the article. I'm sorry it came out this way - I even checked the Wikipedia Library to see if there were any reviews from archived or database sources and came up with nil, which is a shame. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]