Jump to content

Talk:Integrated pest management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Additional Citations and Changes to be done

[edit]

Fixed:

  1. Went through all the references and checked to make sure they contained all relevant information, that links were still viable, deleted reference links that were no longer working and replaced them with new references.
  2. Went through and fixed small grammatical errors.
  3. Added in Bibliography Section
  4. Added the following citations to the bibliography

- Norris, Robert; Caswell-Chen, Edward; Kogan, Marcos. (2002) Concepts of Integrated Pest Management. - Hassanali, Ahmed; Herren, Hans; Khan, Zeyaur R; Pickett, John A; Woodcock, Christine M (2008) Integrated Pest Management: the push-pull method appproach for controlling insects, pests and weeds of cereals, and its potential for other agricultural systems including animal husbandry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 363: 611-621 - Dyck, VA; Hendrichs, J; Robinson, AS. (2005) Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide INtegrated Pest Management. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands - Regnault-Roger, Catherine; Philogene, Bernard JR (2008) Past and Current Prospects for the use of Botanicals and Plant allelochemicals in Integrated Pest Management. Pharm. Bio. 46(1-2): 41-52 - NSF Centre for Integrated Pest Management (2001) CIPM History. Retrieved from http://cipm.ncsu.edu/history.cfm - http://www.biconet.com/reference/IPMhistory.html

  1. Added in section on applications for IPM, including agriculture, Preventive conservation, industry

What needs to be fixed:

  1. Research, fix, and add citations to the history section.
  2. This article states that IPM started at the beginning of the development of pesticides during the Neotechnic Period, other methods of IPM were used before this, but I was unable to find credible sources for this, if you know of some please add them.

Meswetnam (talk) 20:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a bit misleading

[edit]

It states that insectides are used as a last resort in IPM. Not so. "Last resort" implies that a grower has tried all tools and tactics before using a chemical. For example, many diseases are currently managed with the use of chemicals (even oils and naturally-derived compounds are chemicals). It would be more correct to state that IPM is used to reduce the use of any management practice according to its economic need.

I agree Pesticides are often used as part of a program not as a last resort. under IPM pesticides are use strategically. i will change it slightly. --Hypo Mix 08:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if its that misleading, chemicals are usually the last resort in an IPM program, but that definitely depends on how you define last resort. Its not like chemicals are being avoided until a breakout occurs. Sometimes there is no other way to keep pests below acceptable levels without chemicals from the get go, hence chemicals will be used in these programs from the beginning. This is still a last resort use of chemicals, even though the chemicals are always used. However, I like the change of wording since it will avoid confusion.MATThematical (talk) 03:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EIL

[edit]

There is a very critical component missing from this page. It's the keystone of IPM; the economic injury level (EIL). I don't have time to recite pest management 101 here, but open a book on Integrated Pest Management and read for yourself. It's a story about economics.

EIL = C/VIDK 65.172.11.30 05:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The economic injury level is discussed under "acceptable pest level" Bugguyak 19:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC) [[Media:]]]] i think the ecomics is in important to the coutry our <sub people think that they are perfect [reply]

[edit]

This article seems to only address agricultural isses and pests. Pests are a constant threat to museum, library, and archive collections. Because these collections have rare and valuable objects, pesticides should be used as a final resort since more pesticides will be harmful to the objects. This is why a integrated pest management approach is appealing.


Here are some references when dealing with integrated pest management in museums and libraries.


Bachmann, Konstanze. Conservation Concerns. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution

Press, 1992.

Buck, Rebecca A., and Jean Allman Gilmore. The New Museum Registration Methods.

Washington, DC: American Association of Museums, 1998.

Dawson, John E. Solving Museum Insect Problems: Chemical Control. Canada:

Canadian Conservation Institute, 1992.

Knell, Simon. Care of Collections. New York, NY: Routledge, 1994.

Pinniger, David. Insect Pests in Museums. London: Archetype Productions Limited,

1990.


Trumpetsop (talk) 02:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. And not just regarding pest problems with museums and archival collections; this article should be expanded beyond its agricultural focus to cover all structural pest control, too, as IPM is an important strategy used by modern pest control companies. Jaxong (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please consider a link to the University of Florida WoodBug Web site pages on IPM for Woody Ornamentals of the Southeastern U.S. at http://woodypest.ifas.ufl.edu/ipmmap.htm Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 03:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Also consider the following two publications from Michigan State University Extension: -Michigan State University Extension. 2005. Integrated Weed Management: One Year's Seeding (E-2931). 112 pp. -Michigan State University Extension. 2008. Integrated Weed Management: Fine Tuning the System (E-3065). 132 pp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiller12 (talkcontribs) 02:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

[edit]

To what wikiproject does this article belong to ? Add template 87.64.41.73 (talk) 13:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added as agriculture wikiproject

IPM History

[edit]

This article gives the impression that IPM was developed in the later half of the 20th century. Almost no credit is given to ancient civilizations that practiced at least partial IPM. The oldest form of pest management in cultural controls. This article makes it sound like farmers did nothing before the use of pesticides. MATThematical (talk) 03:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective Introduction

[edit]

The introduction of this article is filled with vague opinions such as “IPM poses the least risks while maximizing benefits and reducing costs.”

Whether true or false, statements like these are not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Consider substantiating the claim or attributing it to a specific source, rather than stating vague superiority as fact.

Saklad5 (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Integrated pest management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Integrated pest management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Integrated pest management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Mount Allison University supported by WikiProject Anthropology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose merging Integrated pest management (cultural property) into Integrated pest management. I think the content in the former article can easily be explained in the context of IPM in general, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Integrated pest management. The article Integrated pest management (cultural property) as it is would have to be reformulated and trimmed substantially, as the tone is quite unencyclopedic and there is a fluff. Mooonswimmer 16:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: the two articles are quite substantial and if combined would become quite unwieldy, I think. IPM is an important concept in agriculture and there is a danger that the interesting cultural property aspects (that I was previously unaware of) could become obscured. IMO keep separate with 'see also' links. Roy Bateman (talk) 11:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Closing, with no merge, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 18:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]