Talk:Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Restrictions placed: 6 September 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

India: Politics Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Politics: Political parties Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 2 to 8, 2024

INDIA should redirect to India

How can a country name redirect to a political alliance which is formed few months ago. CHINA, USA, AMERICA, UK, etc redirect to the country name not any other things. It must be according to worldwide view. This is something that seems so biased to a political Propoganda. Loveforwiki (talk) 02:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was a discussion on this previously and consensus was to retarget the all caps phrase (INDIA) to this page about the alliance vs India (country). The rationale was more rooted in how people are searching for the Alliance and how its mentioned in sources. Nothing really politically motivated. Plus there is a hatnote right at the top of the page that links to the country page. Schwinnspeed (talk) 00:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's so inappropriate. A political alliance which is made an year ago is bigger place than its country itself. INDIA should redirect to India, rather tha here. Loveforwiki (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Loveforwiki this issue has been discussed and currently not open to any debate. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 13:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is Jatiya Dal Assam?

In the member parties, the 36th party is "Jatiya Dal Assam" however in its citation, it does not mention such a party, it does however mention the Assam Jatiya Parishad as a part of INDIA. I am asking because I want to edit it to be changed to such, in the case that the JDA does not exist in the alliance

ALazyEditor (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chhatisgarh has 11 Lok Sabha Seats, Congress has 13 seats in Maharashtra, no seat in Ladakh, 99 overall

I don't know whether it's a page admin or someone with some unknown intention, but someone keeps changing facts on this page. Chhattisgarh has 11 Lok Sabha Seats, but someone keeps changing it to 10 for some reason. The Congress has 13 MPs from Maharashtra and 0 MPs from Ladakh, but someone keeps adding independent candidates into the Congress tally instead of the I.N.D.I.A. tally. It appears that this user would like to see the Congress having more than 100 MPs based on some misleading articles on the web, but since it is far from reality, request some neutral admin of this page to get this right once and for all.

And for the one saying "outdated" source, please refer to the current Lok Sabha strength on the official website of the Lok Sabha. (Scroll to the section: "Party-wise representation" [1]https://sansad.in/ls

Hope some official admin fixes this. Thanks. PowerOfFiveFan (talk) 06:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OR. You need to show a secondary source that supports your analysis. Please also read WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, WP:NOTNEWS. ZDX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 07:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"List of Current CM ---- Tamilnadu deputy CM photo " Kinginiptr (talk) 08:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done The AP (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 February 2025

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Can I change the map of the India alliance state governments as Delhi is no longer ruled by AAP? I have the file, too. Veekthedragon (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[I.N.D.I.A Governmental States Feb, 2025.png] is the file if you want to make the edit. :) Veekthedragon (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 February 2025

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

"Gaining more than 100 seats from dissolution" -> "gaining more than 100 seats compared to its pre-dissolution strength."

Rationale: gaining more than 100 seats from dissolution doesn't make any sense. My proposed sentence is actually from a news source. 63.73.199.69 (talk) 02:16, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]