Talk:In the Name of the Father

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the In the Name of the Father article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Northern Ireland Mid‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by ThisIsAce, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 3 August 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Irish republicanism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Change

"However, the film is not a true story as widely believed, merely based in part on actual events." The film is autobiographical; not all events depicted really happened, but the underlying story (pub bombings, Guildford 4 trial, imprisonment, release after appeal) is all true. Removed. --duncan 11:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:In the name of the father ver2.jpg

Image:In the name of the father ver2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dubliners

To me the London setting reminds me of some corners in Dublin. Which scences are filmed in London?

For example the whore#s robbery is in ------ street and the hippies house either. Do you think it#s a good idea to change places for tension on this page? Foreshadowing means something else!--Danaide (talk) 08:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth

Gareth Peirce is a solicitor as is apparent from the wiki entry for that person.

It is also reasonably apparent from the film that she is a solicitor and indeed from the plot summary in this article: she does factual research of a kind not ordinarily carried out by barristers.

She also does some advocacy in the Court of Appeal in the film; I don't know whether she in fact did in real life. The wiki article on Ms Peirce states that it is a composite character.

From memory Emma Thompson has a wig in her car (thus indicating that she is indeed a barrister) - but doesn't wear it in Court! I like to think that there was then a big argument between (1) props, (2) wardrobe, (3) continuity, (4) Emma's agent (who presumably thought that the wig was either unattractive and/or annonymised the wearer, their client) and/or (5) legal advisers to the film at the preview, but I can find no third party source to confirm this.

86.166.129.141 (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 December 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved to alternate proposal. Andrewa (talk) 05:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Name of the Father (film) → In the Name of the Father (1993 film) – per WP:PRIMARYFILM, explicitly states that if a film isn't the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the name, then it shouldn't be under a partial disambiguation like it is now (there's another film under this name). Alternatively, if this film is determined to be the ptopic for said phrase, a move to just "In the Name of the Father" is also reasonable. Zinderboff (talk) 04:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming the 2006 film is actually notable (it's article cites only IMDb), rename per nom. Also would be fine with moving to the primary topic, as the only other serious contender is Trinitarian formula which seems unlikely to be referred to by only its first bit. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support per nom~~. Move to In the Name of the Father per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Theparties (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, move to In the Name of the Father (1993 film). 162 etc. (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to the parenthetically-disambiguated In the Name of the Father (film) still being ambiguous due to two secondary topics of the same name and of the same medium. No issue with undoing it if the 2006 film's notability is challenged, but it may be worth requesting for someone with Persian-language knowledge and research experience to look into that. The director appears to be mentioned in numerous books about Iranian cinema, with a few of them mentioning In the Name of the Father, so there is potential notability to reflect in the Wikipedia article. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to In the Name of the Father, as I overlooked the nom mentioning this as an option, and saw the others below highlighting it. There are good grounds for this film to be the primary topic. Pinging others to see if they'd consider this too: Theparties, 162 etc. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:47, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to In the Name of the Father per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. With well over a thousand hits per day, 97% of all pageviews among anything that could possibly be titled "In the Name of the Father", this is by far the primary topic. (If not moved to the plain title, oppose adding year per WP:INCDAB.) - Station1 (talk) 07:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move to In the Name of the Father. Very clear primary topic by both pageviews and long-term significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.